In August 2002 the GulfWire e-newsletter
service distributed an article called, "Don't
Make Saudi Friend Into Arab Foe," by David Silverberg,
managing editor of "The Hill." The introduction to
the article mentioned the "official Washington" flap of
the week:
One wonders if RAND Corporation
analyst Laurent Murawiec could have imagined his July 10,
2002 briefing "Taking Saudi Out of Arabia" to
the Defense Policy Board (DPB) would have launched him
into his "15 minutes of fame" inside the Beltway
less than a month later. That's exactly what
happened when an August 6, 2002 Washington Post article by
Thomas Ricks, titled "Briefing Depicted Saudis as
Enemies," outlining the think-tank presentation,
reinvigorated the post-"9/11" wave of
Saudi-bashing. |
Two days earlier Jack Shafer writing in Slate
on-line provided more details on Murawiec's briefing,
including the PowerPoint
slides:
..Murawiec's PowerPoint scenario..
makes him sound like an aspiring Dr. Strangelove.. ..The
first half of Murawiec's presentation reads calmly
enough.. ..about why the Arab world hates the United
States.. ..But then Murawiec lights out for the extreme
foreign policy territory, recommending that we threaten
Medina and Mecca, home to Islam's most holy places, if
they don't see it our way. Ultimately, he champions a
takeover of Saudi Arabia.. |
Well, he's back for another 15 minutes. This time it's a
book called, "The Saudi Assault on the West."
And then for something completely different there is Riz Khan's
portrait of Alwaleed
bin Talal, the Saudi Arabian prince ranked #4 on Forbes
list of the wealthiest individuals in the world in 2004.
AlWaleed, according to Forbes, is a "jet-setting prince [who
has transformed] himself into a
businessman-cum-political-activist."
With that as background, we present for your consideration a
review of both books by Doctor F.
Gregory Gause, III, associate professor of political science
at the University of Vermont. This review appeared in the Washington
Post on-line on October 16, 2005 and is reprinted here with
permission.
Patrick W. Ryan
The Saudi Assault on the West
By Laurent Murawiec |

AlWaleed: Businessman, Billionaire, Prince
By Riz Khan |
|
|
Desert Conundrum
Two vastly different takes on the puzzle that is Saudi Arabia
Reviewed by F. Gregory Gause III
Are
these two books about the same country? The first depicts Saudi
Arabia as a violent, benighted place whose ruling family is
pursuing a decades-long plan to subvert American power. The second
is the authorized biography of the richest man in Saudi Arabia, a
member of the ruling family, who is portrayed as the consummate
mix of "East" and "West" -- a man who can
bridge cultures and repair the torn U.S.-Saudi relationship.
Unfortunately, neither is a reliable source about politics and
life in Saudi Arabia today, nor does either book shed much light
on the fascinating, difficult issues involved in relations between
Riyadh and Washington.
Laurent
Murawiec had his 15 minutes of fame in August 2002, when his
briefing on Saudi Arabia before the Pentagon's Defense Policy
Board (a group of outside experts and former officials) was leaked
to this newspaper. Murawiec portrayed Saudi Arabia as the
"kernel of evil" in the Muslim world, the source of the
jihadist movements metastasizing there and thus directly
responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks. His recommendation: To
defeat terrorism, take the "Saudi" out of Arabia. This
book, translated from the French original published in 2003, is an
extended elaboration of his PowerPoint slides.
Murawiec
raises serious issues here but does not treat them in a serious
way. The official Saudi interpretation of Islam, Wahhabism, is a
narrow, puritanical and intolerant reading of the faith. Saudi oil
money, both governmental and private, has played a central role in
spreading the Wahhabi interpretation through the Muslim world.
Wahhabism is one element in the toxic ideological and political
mix that produced Osama bin Laden and his jihad against the United
States. But in his zeal to indict the Saudis for everything that
has gone wrong in the Muslim world (and beyond), Murawiec loses
all sense of proportion. He twists facts, distorts history and
ignores contrary evidence to hammer away at his target.
His
account of the relationship between bin Laden and the Saudi royals
is a case in point. Bin Laden has openly called for the overthrow
of the monarchy since the mid 1990s, and Riyadh stripped him of
his citizenship in 1994. Yet Murawiec contends that the two
parties were tacitly cooperating all along. He chalks up the
switch in bin Laden's strategy -- away from targeting
"apostate" Arab governments and toward targeting the
United States -- to a payoff by Saudi royals to lessen the
jihadists' pressure on them at home. The bin Laden-inspired (if
not orchestrated) bombing campaign in Saudi Arabia that was
launched in 2003 is simply dust in our eyes, according to
Murawiec. Since no members of the ruling family have been killed,
the House of Saud's deal with the devil must still obtain.
No
direct evidence is presented to support these charges. Murawiec
simply says that it has been "rumored for some time in
international intelligence circles" and confirmed to him by
"an Arab foreign minister." Contrary evidence, like the
9/11 Commission's finding that there were no financial relations
between the senior members of the Saudi royal family and bin
Laden, is simply ignored.
Murawiec's
account of the long history of close U.S.-Saudi relations is
equally slanted. The 1973 oil embargo is dealt with at length as
an example of Saudi hostility toward the United States. But the
previous and subsequent decades of close cooperation are simply
attributed to the Saudi success in buying influence in the circles
of American power. (Chapter 11 is entitled "Washington on the
Auction Block.") When the Saudis did cooperate with the
United States, as in the 2003 war against Iraq, it was because
they "could not have done less," whatever that means.
The
potted history of Saudi Arabia that Murawiec presents is just
plain bad. One of the central themes of the book is that the Saudi
royals are the latest manifestation of marauding desert tribesmen,
ignorant, violent and destructive of settled civilization.
Murawiec is wrong on two counts here. First, his 19th-century
stereotyping about "Bedouins" is based on the most
outdated and discredited sources. Second, the al Saud are not
desert tribesmen. They are from the settled population of central
Arabia. They have worked tirelessly to strip the tribes of any
real autonomy and settle them in order to better control them. If
Murawiec had read the academic literature on the country (or even
if he had read more carefully some of the sources he cites), he
would have known this.
This is
not a serious work of history, but Murawiec wants to make a
serious policy argument. Unfortunately, his plan for "taking
Saudi out of Arabia" is so far-fetched that readers might
mistake him for an academic. First, detach the oil-producing
Eastern Province of the country as an "autonomous state
protected by the international community . . . but not subject to
foreign occupation." Murawiec later acknowledges that
"the West" -- that is, the United States -- will have to
occupy the oil fields to accomplish this. Then set up a Middle
East oil authority to spread the oil wealth of this new state
throughout the region. Who will set up this authority? Presumably,
again, "the West." Finally, establish an
"international Muslim college" to administer the holy
places in Mecca and Medina. Will "the West" establish
this college and present the holy cities to it? Murawiec is
unclear. Given how difficult the comparatively modest task of
establishing democracy in Iraq has turned out to be, his
recommendations border on the ridiculous.
Murawiec's
book is a subtraction from the sum total of our knowledge about
Saudi Arabia; Riz Khan's authorized biography of Prince Alwaleed
bin Talal is simply not an addition. Then again, it is not really
meant to be. Khan, a former CNN International correspondent, has
written a celebrity businessman's biography, and he's done a
reasonable, if overly long, job of it. The prince -- who,
according to Forbes magazine, is the fourth-richest man in the
world -- resides in the private jets, massive yachts and luxury
hotels that are the country without borders of the incredibly
rich. Khan chronicles his travels, business dealings and
philosophical musings. Remarkably, he fails to tell us why
Citigroup, of which the prince is a major stockholder, divested
itself in 2004 of its major Saudi asset, a share in the Saudi
American Bank owned by Alwaleed. While Murawiec accepts all the
negative stereotypes about the Arabian Peninsula, Khan gives us
some of the positive desert stereotypes -- Bedouin true to their
traditions, princely generosity distributed in the traditional
Arabian manner (in a tent, even!). Neither stereotype helps us
understand the problems confronting modern Saudi Arabia.
Alwaleed
represents many of the values that Americans would like to see in
Saudi Arabia: hard work, openness to new ideas, concern for
equitable gender policies, friendship with the United States. His
energies, however, seem more concentrated on managing his
extensive international portfolio than on politics at home. His
recent effort to play politics in Lebanon (his mother is from one
of its leading Sunni Muslim families) was a failure. He set
himself up as a rival of Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, who, since
his assassination in Feb. 2005, has become the symbol of Lebanese
nationalism. Alwaleed supported the pro-Syrian president of the
country, Emile Lahoud, whose days in office now seem numbered.
This foray does not speak well of the prince's political acumen.
It remains to be seen whether he has the desire and skill to play
a political role in Saudi Arabia.
The
United States has an interest in the stability of Saudi Arabia's
oil production, and thus of its politics. We need it to play both
a more limited and a more positive role in the Muslim world.
Getting that balance right requires a deeper understanding of how
Saudi Arabia works. It is unfortunate that neither of these books
provides that. �
F.
Gregory Gause III is an associate professor of political science
at the University of Vermont and the author of "Oil
Monarchies."
- "The
PowerPoint That Rocked the Pentagon: The
LaRouchie defector who's advising the defense establishment on
Saudi Arabia," by Jack Shafer, Slate,
August 7, 2002
- The
PowerPoint Brief
- "Taking
Exception: The U.S. Defense Policy Review Board's Briefing on
Saudi Arabia - Al Jazeerah Interview with Dr. John Duke
Anthony," GulfWire Perspectives, August 6, 2002
- "Scapegoating
Saudi Arabia for 9/11," by Ahmad Faruqui, Saudi-American
Forum, Dec. 17, 2003
- Developments
in the Relationship: A Conversation with Gregory Gause -
SUSRIS Interview - March 31, 2005
- How
to Reform Saudi Arabia Without Handing It to Extremists
By
F. Gregory Gause III, SUSRIS IOI, September 22, 2004
- How
to Reform Saudi Arabia Without Handing It to Extremists -
Panel Discussion
Part 1, SUSRIS IOI, September 19, 2004
- How
to Reform Saudi Arabia Without Handing It to Extremists -
Panel Discussion
Part 2, SUSRIS IOI, September 19, 2004
- Executive
Summary -- The Approaching Turning Point: The Future of
U.S. Relations with the Gulf States by F. Gregory Gause, III,
SAF IOI, May 14, 2003
SUSRIS provides listings for
books on US-Saudi relations and developments in the region as a
service to email list subscribers and Web site visitors. The
views expressed in the books and promotional materials are those
of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
Saudi-US Relations Information Service. SUSRIS
is a member of the Amazon.com affiliate program and benefits from
purchases made as a result of linking to Amazon.com from SUSRIS
links.
|