Editor's
Note:
A paper offered by Marina Ottaway and Mohammed Herzallah examines
the "new assertiveness and diplomatic activism" of
countries in the Middle East apart from American foreign policy
leadership. The paper, available through the Carnegie Middle East
Program, is titled, "The New Arab Diplomacy: Not With the
U.S. and Not Against the U.S."
SUSRIS is
pleased to provide an overview of this important discussion with
links (below) to the complete document and related materials on
SUSRIS.org and elsewhere.
To view
the paper in its entirety, click
here.
The New Arab
Diplomacy: Not With the U.S. and Not Against the U.S.
Marina Ottaway & Mohammed Herzallah
Carnegie Paper, July 2008
Arab countries are undertaking diplomatic initiatives that clearly
contradict U.S. policy, because they no longer trust the U.S.
capacity to contend with escalating regional crises. Even Arab
countries traditionally aligned with the United States are no
longer willing to follow Washington's lead on policies toward
Iran, Lebanon, or Hamas, concludes a new paper from the Carnegie
Middle East Program.
Marina Ottaway and Mohammed Herzallah assess the diplomatic
efforts of Arab regimes seeking to fill the power vacuum left by
the absence of a strong regime in Iraq and ineffectual U.S. policy
in "The New Arab Diplomacy: Not With the U.S. and Not Against
the U.S."
Key Conclusions:
-
While new Arab
diplomatic initiatives may contradict current U.S. policy,
they may not contravene long-term U.S. interests.
-
Arab regional
diplomacy lacks an overarching vision and is instead based on
a desire to reduce imminent threats.
-
Influence in
the Arab world has shifted to the Gulf and the change is
likely permanent due to increased oil wealth and the crises
engulfing other regions.
-
The United
States and Saudi Arabia, historically close allies, often hope
for the same outcome in regional conflicts but pursue
different strategies. In trying to contain Iran, Saudi Arabia
seeks to avoid confrontation through diplomatic engagement,
while the United States favors isolation. Saudi Arabia
promotes reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas as a necessary
step in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, while the
United States refuses to recognize Hamas.
-
Qatar and the
United Arab Emirates unexpectedly emerged as extremely active
participants in the new regional diplomacy. Qatar's success in
negotiating the Doha agreement between Lebanese rivals
prompted other initiatives among other Gulf countries.
-
Egypt, consumed
by domestic challenges and a looming succession crisis, has
refrained from intervening in regional issues unless directly
affected, such as the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
-
Aid-dependent
Jordan remains a quiet ally of the United States, neither
opposing the initiatives of other Arab countries, nor
embarking on any of its own.
The authors
conclude:
"The question going forward is whether the new assertiveness
and diplomatic activism, and with them the divergence from U.S.
policies, will continue. This is a question of great importance to
the new U.S. administration. Except in the case of Egypt, the
foreign policies of the countries discussed depend heavily on the
position taken by individual leaders, so they could easily change.
However, Gulf countries are now richer, more developed, and
courted by many for their oil, gas, and investment, and thus are
less likely to simply follow the U.S. lead without questions.
Whether the policies of these countries will diverge from those of
the United States depends as much on U.S. choices as on
theirs."
For the full text of this Carnegie Paper, click
here.
About the
Authors:
Marina S.
Ottaway, director of the Carnegie Middle East Program,
specializes in democracy and post-conflict reconstruction issues,
including political transformation in the Middle East and
reconstruction in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Balkans, and African
countries. She is a senior associate in the Democracy and Rule of
Law Program, which analyzes the state of democracy around the
world and the efforts by the United States and other countries to
promote democracy.
Mohammed Herzallah was the 2007-2008 junior research fellow
for the Carnegie Middle East Program. His research interests
include democracy and the rule of law, international economic
development, and Arab politics.
About the
Carnegie Endowment:
The
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is a private, nonprofit
organization dedicated to advancing cooperation between nations
and promoting active international engagement by the United
States. Founded in 1910, its work is nonpartisan and dedicated to
achieving practical results.
Carnegie
publishes Foreign
Policy, one of the world's leading magazines of
international politics and economics which reaches readers in more
than 120 countries and several languages.
Related
Items:
-
Why
Not Try Diplomacy? - Amb. Chas. W. Freeman, Jr - SUSRIS IOI -
Apr 1, 2008
-
American
Interests, Policies, and Results in the Middle East: Energy,
Israel, Access, and the Containment of Muslim Rage - Amb.
Chas. W. Freeman, Jr. - SUSRIS IOI - Feb 26, 2008
-
Impressions
of Arabia, Autumn 2007 - Chas W. Freeman, Jr. - SUSRIS IOI -
Nov 26, 2007
-
Can
American Leadership Be Restored? - Chas W. Freeman, Jr. -
SUSRIS IOI - May 31, 2007
-
National
Security in the Age of Terrorism - Chas W. Freeman, Jr. -
SUSRIS IOI - Jan 11, 2007
-
The
GCC and the Management of Policy Consequences - Chas W
Freeman, Jr. - SUSRIS IOI - Nov 3, 2006
-
Building
Understanding: The Role of the MEPC - A Conversation with Chas
W. Freeman, Jr. - SUSRIS Interview - Sep 20, 2006
-
Strengthening
the Relationship: Whose Job? A Conversation with Chas W.
Freeman, Jr. - SUSRIS Interview - Aug 14, 2006
-
The
Arabs Take a Chinese Wife: Sino-Arab Relations in the Decade
to Come - Chas W. Freeman, Jr.- SUSRIS IOI - Jun 1, 2006
-
How
Can the U.S. Re-Open for Business to the Arab World? - MEPC
Capitol Hill Forum - Part 1 - Ambassador Chas Freeman - SUSRIS
IOI - Apr 14, 2006
-
Defining
Interests and a Changing Relationship - Ambassador Chas
Freeman Interview - Part I - SUSRIS Interview Series - Oct.
29, 2004
-
U.S.-Saudi
Relations: The Path Ahead - Ambassador Chas Freeman Interview
- Part II - SUSRIS Interview Series - Oct. 30, 2004
-
The
Way Forward: A Diplomat's Perspective - Remarks by Ambassador
Chas W. Freeman, Jr. - 13th Arab-U.S. Policymakers Conference
-Washington, DC - September 13, 2004