Editor's Note:
A paper offered by Marina Ottaway and Mohammed Herzallah examines the "new assertiveness and diplomatic activism" of countries in the Middle East apart from American foreign policy leadership. The paper, available through the Carnegie Middle East Program, is titled, "The New Arab Diplomacy: Not With the U.S. and Not Against the U.S."
SUSRIS is pleased to provide an overview of this important discussion with links (below) to the complete document and related materials on SUSRIS.org and elsewhere.
To view the paper in
its entirety,
click here.
The New Arab Diplomacy:
Not With the U.S. and Not Against the U.S.
Marina Ottaway & Mohammed Herzallah
Carnegie Paper, July 2008
Arab countries are undertaking diplomatic initiatives that
clearly contradict U.S. policy, because they no longer trust
the U.S. capacity to contend with escalating regional
crises. Even Arab countries traditionally aligned with the
United States are no longer willing to follow Washington's
lead on policies toward Iran, Lebanon, or Hamas, concludes a
new paper from the Carnegie Middle East Program.
Marina Ottaway and Mohammed Herzallah assess the diplomatic
efforts of Arab regimes seeking to fill the power vacuum
left by the absence of a strong regime in Iraq and
ineffectual U.S. policy in "The New Arab Diplomacy: Not With
the U.S. and Not Against the U.S."
Key Conclusions:
-
While new Arab
diplomatic initiatives may contradict current U.S.
policy, they may not contravene long-term U.S.
interests.
-
Arab regional
diplomacy lacks an overarching vision and is instead
based on a desire to reduce imminent threats.
-
Influence in the Arab
world has shifted to the Gulf and the change is likely
permanent due to increased oil wealth and the crises
engulfing other regions.
-
The United States and
Saudi Arabia, historically close allies, often hope for
the same outcome in regional conflicts but pursue
different strategies. In trying to contain Iran, Saudi
Arabia seeks to avoid confrontation through diplomatic
engagement, while the United States favors isolation.
Saudi Arabia promotes reconciliation between Fatah and
Hamas as a necessary step in the Israeli-Palestinian
peace process, while the United States refuses to
recognize Hamas.
-
Qatar and the United
Arab Emirates unexpectedly emerged as extremely active
participants in the new regional diplomacy. Qatar's
success in negotiating the Doha agreement between
Lebanese rivals prompted other initiatives among other
Gulf countries.
-
Egypt, consumed by
domestic challenges and a looming succession crisis, has
refrained from intervening in regional issues unless
directly affected, such as the humanitarian crisis in
Gaza.
-
Aid-dependent
Jordan
remains a quiet ally of the United States, neither
opposing the initiatives of other Arab countries, nor
embarking on any of its own.
The authors conclude:
"The question going forward is whether the new assertiveness
and diplomatic activism, and with them the divergence from
U.S. policies, will continue. This is a question of great
importance to the new U.S. administration. Except in the
case of Egypt, the foreign policies of the countries
discussed depend heavily on the position taken by individual
leaders, so they could easily change. However, Gulf
countries are now richer, more developed, and courted by
many for their oil, gas, and investment, and thus are less
likely to simply follow the U.S. lead without questions.
Whether the policies of these countries will diverge from
those of the United States depends as much on U.S. choices
as on theirs."
For the full text of this Carnegie Paper,
click here.
About the
Authors:
Marina S.
Ottaway, director of the Carnegie Middle East Program,
specializes in democracy and post-conflict reconstruction
issues, including political transformation in the Middle
East and reconstruction in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Balkans,
and African countries. She is a senior associate in the
Democracy and Rule of Law Program, which analyzes the state
of democracy around the world and the efforts by the United
States and other countries to promote democracy.
Mohammed Herzallah was the 2007-2008 junior research
fellow for the Carnegie Middle East Program. His research
interests include democracy and the rule of law,
international economic development, and Arab politics.
About
the Carnegie Endowment:
The
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is a private, nonprofit
organization dedicated to advancing cooperation between nations
and promoting active international engagement by the United
States. Founded in 1910, its work is nonpartisan and dedicated to
achieving practical results.
Carnegie
publishes Foreign
Policy, one of the world's leading magazines of
international politics and economics which reaches readers in more
than 120 countries and several languages.
Related Items:
-
Why Not Try Diplomacy? - Amb. Chas. W. Freeman, Jr - SUSRIS IOI - Apr 1, 2008
-
American Interests, Policies, and Results in the Middle East: Energy, Israel, Access, and the Containment of Muslim Rage - Amb. Chas. W. Freeman, Jr. - SUSRIS IOI - Feb 26, 2008
-
Impressions of Arabia, Autumn 2007 - Chas W. Freeman, Jr. - SUSRIS IOI - Nov 26, 2007
-
Can American Leadership Be Restored? - Chas W. Freeman, Jr. - SUSRIS IOI - May 31, 2007
-
National Security in the Age of Terrorism - Chas W. Freeman, Jr. - SUSRIS IOI - Jan 11, 2007
-
The GCC and the Management of Policy Consequences - Chas W Freeman, Jr. - SUSRIS IOI - Nov 3, 2006
-
Building Understanding: The Role of the MEPC - A Conversation with Chas W. Freeman, Jr. - SUSRIS Interview - Sep 20, 2006
-
Strengthening the Relationship: Whose Job? A Conversation with Chas W. Freeman, Jr. - SUSRIS Interview - Aug 14, 2006
-
The Arabs Take a Chinese Wife: Sino-Arab Relations in the Decade to Come - Chas W. Freeman, Jr.- SUSRIS IOI - Jun 1, 2006
-
How Can the U.S. Re-Open for Business to the Arab World? - MEPC Capitol Hill Forum - Part 1 - Ambassador Chas Freeman - SUSRIS IOI - Apr 14, 2006
-
Defining Interests and a Changing Relationship - Ambassador Chas Freeman Interview - Part I - SUSRIS Interview Series - Oct. 29, 2004
-
U.S.-Saudi Relations: The Path Ahead - Ambassador Chas Freeman Interview - Part II - SUSRIS Interview Series - Oct. 30, 2004
-
The Way Forward: A Diplomat's Perspective - Remarks by Ambassador Chas W. Freeman, Jr. - 13th Arab-U.S. Policymakers Conference -Washington, DC - September 13, 2004