Saudi System is the Problem
by Rachel Bronson
and Isobel Coleman
After the recent Crawford meeting between
President Bush and Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince
Abdullah, it appears that the two countries have
made great strides in mending frayed relations.
The Saudis got some much-needed public hand-holding, and in return they agreed to take
steps to lower long-term oil prices. The crown
prince told a close adviser that "it wasn't a
good meeting; it was a great meeting."
Lost in the blizzard of the media coverage that
focused primarily on oil is
the fact that the two leaders announced plans to
increase the number of Saudi students studying in
the U.S., expand military exchange programs that
provide education to Saudi officers, and
facilitate American travel to the kingdom. The
president deserves credit for putting such
seemingly banal issues on the bilateral agenda.
Notwithstanding the price of oil, few issues are
more important to American national security.
Today Saudi Arabia faces an education crisis.
During our recent two-week visit to the kingdom,
the need for educational reform arose repeatedly
among parents, policymakers, journalists,
religious clerics and business leaders.
There
is a grudging awareness that, at the extremes, the
system produces terrorists. One former high-level
government official described Imam Mohammed bin
Saud Islamic University in Riyadh as "a
factory for terrorism."
There is also widespread acknowledgment that the
system is failing to
produce productive members of society. With 60
percent of Saudi Arabia's population under the age
of 18, the kingdom cannot afford passivity in
preparing the next generation.
That many Saudis now recognize the scope of their
problem is evidenced by a growing interest in
private education. At the primary and secondary
levels, Saudi business interests are working with
Western venture capitalists to set up for-profit
alternatives to public education. Multinational
consulting companies are quietly exploring
opportunities for educational development. The
kingdom itself has initiated pilot programs
testing different models of public education.
Given local demand and international concern,
Washington and Riyadh should capitalize on the
Crawford meeting's window of opportunity and lay
out commitments for educational reform. Education
remains one of the few areas where the U.S. can
credibly engage with Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia's
elite are mostly U.S.-educated, and America's
educational institutions are still highly
regarded. |
Washington and
Riyadh should
capitalize on
the
Crawford
meeting's window
of opportunity and
lay
out commitments
for educational
reform. Education
remains one of the
few areas where the
U.S. can
credibly
engage with Saudi
Arabia. |
As one U.S. State Department official recently
noted, "America's outstanding academic
institutions are as valuable to U.S. national
security as is the protection of our
borders." It is thus particularly troubling
that the number of post 9-11 Saudi student visas
to the U.S. declined by 80 percent and has yet to
recover. Newly promised presidential attention
will help reverse this trend.
In addition to increasing student visas,
Washington should continue quietly expanding
teach-the-teacher and teach-the-imam programs in
the United States and promoting joint ventures
like that between Duke University and Effat
College, the private women's college in Jeddah.
In return, the crown prince must do more than send
a few Saudi students and military officers to the
U.S. One of the most important things the crown
prince has done over the last two years is sponsor
a series of "national dialogues" that
have tackled the most pressing issues facing the
kingdom: religious intolerance, the role of women
and the status of Saudi youth.
Although
few concrete results have come from these
discussions, they have given Saudis permission to
engage on these highly sensitive topics in a way
that was until recently unthinkable.
The crown prince should now insist that the fifth
national dialogue,
scheduled for December, confront head-on Saudi
Arabia's education crisis in order to build a
consensus for bold curriculum reform and set out a
timeline with clear milestones.
Such milestones could include a commitment to
convene a panel of educators with a firm mandate
to implement an internationally accredited
curriculum within two years; a shift away from
teacher-centric rote memorization through the
adoption of more analytic teaching methodologies;
a significant budget – allocated from Saudi
Arabia's oil revenue surplus this year – to
introduce more technology into the classroom and
distance learning programs to connect students
with the rest of the world; and the creation of
school-based parent-teacher councils to give
parents more input into their children's
education. These measures would address not only
the content of what is being taught in Saudi
schools, but also the context in which it is
taught.
Given its demographics, Saudi Arabia cannot afford
baby steps on this issue. Yet on issues of
educational reform, the crown prince and his
supporters will be fought tooth and nail by
conservative elements within society – and the
royal family – and therefore need to know that
Washington and the American people are closely
watching. Neither side can accept the conclusion
of one discouraged Saudi journalist that "our
education system has come through the storms
unscathed and unchanged."
While issues of counter terrorism,
Israeli-Palestinian peace and high oil
prices can appear to have greater urgency, over
the longer term nothing will benefit U.S.-Saudi
relations more than tackling educational reform.
Unfortunately, the intense media focus on oil
prices will only send the
message back to the kingdom that Americans are no
longer interested in
reform. Has 9-11 receded so far in our memories
that the U.S.-Saudi
relationship is once again about nothing more than
the price at the pump?
Reprinted with
permission.
[This
op-ed appeared on DallasNews.com on May 7, 2005.]
Rachel
Bronson is a Senior Fellow and Director of
Middle East Studies and the author of the
forthcoming "Thicker Than Oil: The United
States and Saudi Arabia, a History."
Isobel
Coleman, Senior Fellow, US Foreign Policy,
Council on Foreign Relations - Expert on economic
development in the Middle East and South Asia;
director of a Council on Foreign Relations
initiative on women and U.S. foreign policy,
focusing on the role of women in economic and
political development in the broader Middle East.